Sponsored Links
 
Latest Articles
 
Member's Resources
 
Members Log In
Home    What is SOW?    Who Are We?    W.O.W.    Wealth Forum    Advertise For Wealth    Disclaimer    Terms Of Use    Privacy Statement    Newsletter    Testimonies    Contact Us
FREE Registration Here

Wealth Resources By Country
News!
The W.O.W. System
Wealth Resources
Wealth Creation Strategy
Wealth Education
Wealth Products
Wealth Services
Wealth Events
Wealth Experts
Wealth Queries
Wealth Factsheet
Wealth Articles
Wealth Tools
Wealth Games
Wealth Planning & Management
Financial Capitals of the World
 
Dubai - U.A.E.
Frankfurt - Germany
Hong Kong
London - U.K.
New York - U.S.A.
Paris - France
Seoul - South Korea
Shanghai - China
Singapore
Taipei - Taiwan
Tokyo - Japan
Negotiate the Best Deal
Copyright © 2008. Strategy of Wealth. All Rights Reserved.
Members Log Out
Seeking Financial Advice - Selecting the right candidate

10 ways to overcome the shrinking dollar

How to beat inflation?

Common Fallacies of Investing

5 Things to take note before you refinance your home loan


A Well-Diversified Portfolio = Healthy Investments

Have You Got Your Longevity Risk Covered?

How To Profit From The Forex Market?

Your Piggy Bank is Protected in the Event of a Bank Run

When Investing, Patience is Essential

More Articles...
pulzzz.com
Technical Analysis on the Singapore and U.S. Markets. Providing in-depth alerts for traders and investors
Channel NewsAsia, 11 September 2009
Minibond investors sue Royal Bank of Scotland

SINGAPORE: A group of investors who had lost money in Lehman Brothers Minibonds has begun legal action against Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) in a bid to recoup their losses.

They are taking RBS to court for allegedly misleading them into buying the toxic products. RBS is being sued because it bought over ABN—AMRO, which had sold the Minibonds to the investors.

The group of about 170 investors call themselves the Minibond Investors Action Group or MIAG. Among them, they had invested a total of S$20 million, with most of them putting in between S$150,000 and S$200,000 each.

They are not what the government considers "vulnerable" investors — that is, those over 62 years old and who have primary school qualifications.

The "vulnerable class" has had some success in gaining compensation after the Monetary Authority of Singapore intervened early this year.

But an MIAG member told Channel NewsAsia that the prospectus was so confusing it would not have been understood even by sophisticated investors. He also said the bank did not do its duty by making sure the product was safe.

Chung Wing Kee, an MIAG committee member, said: "If the financial institution had told me that ’actually it’s not bonds we’re selling, we just use the word ’minibonds’ to bring you in’, it’s not bonds, it’s a complex instrument, I won’t touch it!"

Mr Chung said that going to FIDReC, which is the Financial Industry Disputes Resolution Centre, will not allow the investors to recover the bulk of their investments. That is because FIDReC has a cap of S$50,000 against which claims can be made.

He said the group’s members are confident they have a good chance of winning, and based on the success of Minibond investors in Hong Kong, they are hoping to get back at least 70 per cent of their investment capital.

And this will not be the last lawsuit by MIAG. The investors had bought products from 10 financial institutions. If they succeed in their case against RBS, they will initiate lawsuits against the others.


Strategy of Wealth